Beautifying the Bride of Christ Through Passionate, Gospel-Centered Reform

Friday, September 24, 2010

Do Twinkies Make You Fat? The Institute’s Position on Church Programs

If I were to eat a box of Twinkies each week, would you be surprised if I gained 20 pounds by the end of the year? I would think not.

What would you think if someone shot and killed a teller in the midst of robbing a bank and then pleaded before the judge that the gun shot the teller, not him? Most people would rightly consider such a claim as lunacy.

Twinkies don’t make people fat. Guns don’t kill people. In both cases, the Twinkies and the gun are merely passive tools in the hands of a heart that is seeking to use those tools for its own selfish ends, rather than the glory of God.

And, so, with that introduction we take a look at church programs.

It seems that much of the debate these days about the dire problems of the church and home centers on church programs. In the eyes of some, the very real problems of youth rebellion, parents divorcing, singles feeling like second-class citizens in the church, etc., etc. are laid at the feet of these programs—or lack of these programs.

The history of how the church came to accept many of the programs that have become ubiquitous in our churches today really doesn’t matter because the programs are really not the issue. Making the programs the issue is a tragic distraction from the real matter that continues to miss our attention.

The heart of the matter is the matter of the heart. Our hearts as church leaders, as parents, as children, as brothers and sisters in the Lord are desperately in need of transformation. Jesus tells us that heart transformation is not an outside-in pursuit, but an inside-out pursuit that is the ongoing work of the application of the Gospel in our hearts every day.

A church’s leaders can add/change/delete programs all they want, but if the heart is not the focus and the Gospel not the means it makes little difference.

At the Institute, we support each church’s examination of church programs to see how they are helping/hindering the work of the Gospel message through relationships. Let’s face it, none of the programs are called-for in Scripture but that does not make them wrong anymore than [under the same logic] that hymnals are declared wrong because they are not mentioned in Scripture.

Can programs be abused? Certainly. And I think that it is fair to assume that they are abused more than anyone is willing to admit. People abuse (by omission) their covenantal obligations to other members of the local church but we do not dismiss that as an obligation they still bare as a member of the body of Christ.

In my 20 years of working with churches I can say that I have seen churches where real, gospel-centered heart-level transformation is taking place and programs are a real help. I have also seen churches where these programs are carrying too much responsibility and being misused—and the people who run them are suffering because of it. In the ladder case, often there is no intentional focus on heart-level transformation by the Gospel through relationships visible in the church’s ministry.

I have also seen churches that have made programs the issue. Concluding that the programs were “not biblical” they got rid of them in very short order which caused great damage to the households who were not equipped to handle such a dramatic shift. In the cases where I’ve seen this happen, heart-level transformation by the Gospel was nowhere to be seen.

In coaching church leaders the Institute does not make programmatic changes the focus. However, some churches, under the leadership of the Holy Spirit, may conclude that they need to add/change/delete some or all of those programs at some point. We believe that this represents an area of freedom. When heart-level transformation by the Gospel through relationships is the focus, many of the questions regarding programs take care of themselves.

There is much more that I would like to say on this topic but I believe that this offers a good sense of where the Institute stands.

No comments:

Post a Comment